Why executive search needs a named-market approach
Senior leadership mandates rarely become easier after a job post goes live. A credible VP or C-suite candidate is often performing well, not looking publicly, and evaluating risk before taking a first conversation. I start by defining the actual leadership problem, the mandate, and the narrow candidate market that can solve it.
Where this fits
C-suite and VP-level leadership search
For organizations hiring a senior leader who must set direction, build a function, or take ownership of a material operating outcome.
Board-level and transition searches
For board-sensitive mandates, founder succession, CEO transition planning, and other leadership changes that require discretion.
Functional VP searches
For VP Sales, VP Marketing, VP Finance, VP Operations, and adjacent functional leadership seats where the operating context matters as much as the title.
How I run an executive search
I begin with the business mandate, decision rights, success measures, and the candidate market — not a generic title search. I then conduct direct, confidential outreach, calibrate the shortlist against the actual mandate, and keep the process moving through interviews and close. The engagement is exclusive, contingent-first, and backed by a twelve-month guarantee.
Markets covered
Current city and topic pages for this hub:
Frequently asked questions
Competitive positioning
Heidrick & Struggles / Korn Ferry / Spencer Stuart — retained engagements and longer process design can be appropriate for a global or board-critical mandate. They are not the only answer when a company needs a focused, contingent-first search to begin without an up-front retainer.
I run exclusive contingent searches at retained-search execution standards — a different engagement model, not a boutique imitation of the retained firms. I use direct outreach, clear calibration, and a twelve-month guarantee.